![]() Using external engines you can run dynamic sites that are written with PHP, Perl, Ruby, Python, and Java. The LSWS wiki has tutorials and I’m sure any host that offers LiteSpeed will set things up for you. Like NGINX, it passes requests for dynamic content to an external engine which you need to configure. The event-driven nature of LiteSpeed means it doesn’t interpret PHP and other server-side languages natively. Instead of Apache’s 1:1 process to request setup, LiteSpeed can handle hundreds of thousands of requests and connections with just a few processes and since starting a new process is the main overhead on the CPU, LiteSpeed can handle all these connections using fewer resources than Apache. Like NGINX, LiteSpeed uses an event-driven architecture. Where LiteSpeed differs from Apache is in its architecture. I noticed the plugin is listed as active on more than 100,000 sites, with nearly all 5-star reviews. If you happen to use WordPress like I do, LiteSpeed offers a plugin specifically to make use of its cache. There’s also an enterprise version that does more and costs more. The cost of the proprietary version isn’t prohibitive at $14/month to lease or $249 to own. Instead configuration is though a web interface. The downside to OpenLiteSpeed is that it doesn’t read Apache’s configuration files or completely support. It is proprietary like IIS, but there’s an open-source version called OpenLiteSpeed. htaccess files so that it doesn’t need to check every directory for the file, removing the performance overhead. LiteSpeed also offers a built-in cache, including intelligent caching for. It’s also compatible with all of Apache’s core modules. You can replace an existing Apache server with a LiteSpeed server in a short amount of time, measured in minutes, and with no downtime to your site. LiteSpeed can read Apache configuration files. Litespeed web server stable release code#If the term is new to you, it means you can replace Apache with LiteSpeed without having to make any other code or configuration changes. LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS)Īs I said, LiteSpeed is a drop-in replacement for Apache. I also want to share a few performance tests I ran on this site both before and after my hosting company moved my account to newer server hardware. Today I want to talk about one more application for running a server, LiteSpeed, which is a drop-in replacement for Apache. My focus has been on the architecture of each in order to point out their performance pros and cons. Litespeed web server stable release software#The last few weeks I’ve been talking about server software offering posts on Apache, NGNINX, and IIS. I started with a couple of posts about hosting plans and server hardware. So, static sites can get more out of LiteSpeed than Apache.For most of the last two months, I’ve been talking about website performance, specifically as it relates to server response times. So, each new request isn’t only served faster but also takes less RAM. LiteSpeed can perform amazingly when it comes to compressing pages. It is six times faster than Apache when handling static content. Thus, LiteSpeed improves the PHP performance of the server by 50%. It uses an advanced caching methodology that enables the system to store compressed cache files rather than creating a new request whenever the viewer tries to check them. Hence, it is more flexible with concurrent connections and higher traffic. However, when it comes to static content, the story is a little different. But if you have a bigger website, the advanced page compression feature of LiteSpeed gives it an edge. LiteSpeed is good, but Apache offers a little better raw speed. Thus, it is able to handle more loads better and maintain speedy performance in a multi-user PHP environment. Apache can be configured using PHP-FPM or FastCGI. When Apache and LiteSpeed are put to test, there is no clear winner. Magneto, Drupal, and Joomla offer better chances to use a CMS solution. Various tools are employed to create dynamic content, and one such tool is CMS. It determines how a server can handle requests from various users of the web. A majority of the websites today are dynamic. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |